False AlarmFalse Alarm

Posted July 14th, 2008 by paul | Leave a Comment »
Category: Blog |

Google has banned my site. They are raising a false alarm about my blog being an attack site, and are blocking it for users of Google Desktop (as far as I can tell).

I’ve checked my site code, and the only way I can imagine that I’m passing on “attack” content is if it is served from the Google ads. Now isn’t that ironic? Google placed the ads on my site then blocked it because they say the ads are “badware.” it turns out my blog got attacked. (Read more about this in a later post.)

And how is this my fault? And what does Google want me to do about it? If this isn’t resolved in a day or so, I’ll have no choice but to remove the Google advertising.

This is rediculous!

UPDATE (later the same day): So, it turns out I was wrong about what I wrote here. Google found some legitimate badware linked from the site. It turns out my WordPress blog got hacked. But I’ve now fixed the problem, so there is no need to worry any more! Deletions to the original post are crossed out and additions are in italics. 

Print this post, or send it to a frend: Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post

Communication isn’t always easyCommunication isn’t always easy

Posted July 2nd, 2008 by paul | 2 Comments »
Category: Technical Writing, Technology |

In my spare time I occasionally do some web design and web hosting work for a couple of different clients. Mostly these are my family members, friends, and neighbors who need a relatively simple website and a place to host it.

Recently I started helping out an uncle with a site for his new business. He had already worked with a designer to create some printed letterhead, and he wanted to use the same stuff for the header on his website. He said he’d send me a copy of the letterhead so I could put it on the site.

The letterhead came as a Word document, and I didn’t love the font choice, so I told him. He said he did like it, and he’d already used it to send out some letters and create business cards, so he wanted to keep it. I said I’d get it up on the site.

The Word document had the following font (I’ve only reproduced part of it, for the sake of my client’s privacy):

comm1

I thought the font wasn’t very professional, and I couldn’t get the font out of the Word document, and I wanted to make it a bit clearer for the website, so I found a close font which looked like this:

comm3

It wasn’t a perfect replica, but I thought it looked better than what he had. He contacted me and wanted the font changed back to the original. This didn’t look like his letterhead, and he wanted a consistent look and feel. I told him that without the font file I couldn’t re-create the logo in Photoshop, so I’d have to just take a screen shot of the Word document and make that the header image. He thought that was a fine solution. I took a screen shot of the Word document, and up went the original image:

comm1

The next day he contacted me again and said he still didn’t like the image. He thought it looked unprofessional and by the way, weren’t we going to just take a screen shot of the Word document?

Then it dawned on my wife that what he was seeing in his Word document was different from what we were seeing in our Word document. In fact, he hadn’t embedded the font into the Word document, so when I opened the document on my machine, Word did a silent replacement of the font.

After he embedded the font in the Word document, I was able to see the same letterhead he was seeing:

comm3

No wonder he didn’t like the first two attempts!

We both thought we were communicating, because we were both looking at the same source document, when in fact, we were seeing something completely different, but didn’t know how to talk about it. That was due, in part, to our family relationship; he didn’t want to tell me how ugly it was, and how it didn’t look anything like what he was seeing. Our family relationship hindered our ability to communicate properly in a business relationship.

At least now we have the right font on the site. And next time, we’ll make sure we’re both talking about the same thing when there is an apparent disagreement.

Print this post, or send it to a frend: Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post

WALL-EWALL-E

Posted July 1st, 2008 by paul | Leave a Comment »
Category: General/Random |

WALL-E _and_EVE_Pixar_Disney

I saw WALL-E last weekend with my wife, and we had a really good time. The movie was fun, and really worth seeing. I have to admit that when I first saw EVE, I leaned over to my wife and said, “She’s a Mac, and he’s a PC” which led to my graphic, above.

What I liked

Pixar is amazing. The animation in this movie is simply stunning. I was very impressed by the lighting, the reflections, and the texture that almost made you forget you were watching an animated movie. The story is driven by action, not by dialog. In fact, there is precious little dialog, especially for the first 30 minutes or so. This means the story must show, rather than tell, which generally makes for more powerful filmmaking anyway.

Since there is so little dialog, the sound effects and score end up being a lot more important, and they don’t disappoint. In fact, I thought they were phenomenal. I  fully expect WALL-E to be nominated for some major awards in this category.

WALL-E is a very likable little robot, and the romance story between him and EVE is cute but maybe a tad cliché: the backwards guy falls for the sophisticated, classy girl who is uninterested until he saves her by sacrificing himself in some way, and she falls in love with him. But it was well told and cute. The story while following the traditional arc remained unpredictable, and I kept wondering what would happen next and how the story would resolve.

What I disliked

In general, I love Pixar/Disney movies. I love the underlying stories that make the characters real and lovable. The character development is usually at the root of the story. In WALL-E, however, there isn’t much character development. The characters pretty much remain flat without much motivation. As my father-in-law pointed out, there isn’t much to WALL-E’s character arc; in fact, it’s pretty flat.

I decided that what brings me back to a movie is the story line, and after I saw how the story would be resolved, I’m not sure WALL-E has what it takes to bring me back to a story over and over again. I’m not in it for the action, I’m in it for the characters, and I’m not sure that WALL-E’s characters were strong enough to bring me back for more.

I am willing to give it a second go, however, so maybe I’ll find that WALL-E is charming enough to make me re-watch it for other reasons than character development. We’ll have to see about that one.

Conclusion

I really liked this movie. I thought it was well worth the time and money investment. It is a film that people of all ages will enjoy. I give it four and a half stars. You really need to see this one–at least once, maybe more.

And let me know if you thought the same think about EVE reminding you of a sleek MacBook Air, or some other Mac product… I thought it was bang-it-in-your-face obvious.

Print this post, or send it to a frend: Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post

Expecting the UnexpectedExpecting the Unexpected

Posted June 30th, 2008 by paul | 16 Comments »
Category: General/Random |

Today I was reading a CNN.com news article on the largest scientific experiment in history, an atom collider being built in Eurpoe, when I encountered the following quote:

The machine, which has been called the largest scientific experiment in history, isn’t expected to begin test runs until August, and ramping up to full power could take months. But once it is working, it is expected to produce some startling findings. (source)

If the findings are expected, how will they be startling?

I get what the reporter was trying to say, but I thought the line was humerous, and thought you might enjoy it too.

Print this post, or send it to a frend: Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post

ABC 4 video with short interviewABC 4 video with short interview

Posted May 28th, 2008 by paul | Leave a Comment »
Category: General/Random |

>компютриw is an interview with ABC4, plus video of the event. Check out time stamp 0:35 - 0:59.

Print this post, or send it to a frend: Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post