Category: Opinion

Take it easy, for cryin’ out loud!Take it easy, for cryin’ out loud!

Posted August 4th, 2005 by paul.
Category: Opinion | 1 Comment »

A couple of weeks ago, Christina and I had gotten off the freeway at 90th South and were approaching State Street to turn left. All the lights our direction were red, and the cars were lined up about 8-deep waiting for the signal to change. We pulled into the turn lane, and we saw two men in the left lane (to our right) out of their cars. We slowed down to see if there was an accident or something, and as we approached, we saw that they were yelling at each other. There was no car accident, it was simply road rage. One of the men didn’t like what the other had done, and they got into a yelling match, and then they got out of their cars to yell at each other.

I was appalled that these men could totally lose control to the point that they were totally incapable of containing their emotions. The outpouring of rage was paliptable and was disgusting. There is absolutley no excuse for behavior like that.

This morning I read an article on CNN.com (open in new window) in which two men got into an agrument over something that happened while they were driving. The first man drove off, dropped off his wife, and drove back to the scene, found the other man (who was in the process of lifting his baby out of her car seat) and shot him four times, killing him.

We live in a world where popular media encourages violence, but we have to take a stand. Turn off the violent movies. Burn the violent CDs. When you feel rage building up inside you, control it! There is no excuse for allowing yourself to lose control.

The shooter’s license plate was written down by witnesses, and police found him at his home. He has been charged with first degree murder. I hope they put him away for a long time.

Next time you feel like you might lose control of yourself, remember the man in jail, and remember the little girl without a daddy, and let it go.

The power of a wordThe power of a word

Posted October 6th, 2004 by Paul.
Category: Blog, Opinion | 2 Comments »

At the top of my blog, under the title, there is a quote from Anthony Robbins in which he says that we must recognize the differences in the way that we perceive the world, and then we must use that understanding as a guide when we communicate with other people.

With that in mind, I want to tell you about a conversation I overheard last night on the TRAX train as I rode home from work.

Let me interrupt myself to tell you how much I like riding the train to work. We live about 1/2 a mile from the Historic Sandy station, and I work about 1/4 a mile from the Delta Center station. Riding the train is GREAT. Since I stopped listening to music on the train (another story for another day), I have learned that I really enjoy listening to other people; it really is fascinating. Okay. Back to my story.

Yesterday evening a family of maybe 8-10 people boarded the train at the City Center station. They had obviously just been to the Titanic exhibit at the ZCMI Center mall in downtown Salt Lake. They were carrying bags with souvenirs and had a replica of a newspaper that described the sinking of the ship.

Seated directly in front of me was the dad of the family. To his left was his son who seemed to be about ten years old. Across the aisle was the boy’s mother and sisters; behind me were the rest of the extended family (maybe including aunts/uncles/cousins, etc.). The boy was excitedly holding a model he bought of the Titanic (called Titanic Book and Submersible Model Purchase/Reviews at: Yes Magazine, Amazon.com, Deseret Book).

The boy’s mother asked him how much he had paid for the model. He said it was about twenty dollars. His mother didn’t believe him and asked to see the receipt. He showed her. The receipt showed he had paid twenty-one dollars and change, with tax. She asked him if he had got the right change back. He said that he counted it, and it was right. She then said that store clerks like to take advantage of kids and try to steal their money. The boy responded by saying, “But I look smart.” The mom replied (in a somewhat teasing tone), “No you don’t.”

Looking for validation, the boy turned to his father and said, “Daddy, do I look smart?” The dad, not looking up from his newspaper replied (also in a somewhat teasing tone), “no.”

Ouch.

Later in the trip, the boy was describing the sinking model to his dad, and the dad said, “I don’t think you can even put it together.”

The boy replied, “Yes I can. My friend has one, and I’ve seen him play with it.”

The dad responded, “No you haven’t.”

The boy said, “Yes I have–and it is really cool how it floats, then when you flip a switch, it takes a couple of seconds, but then it sinks just like the real Titanic.”

The dad said, “I bet you will probably just break it after a couple of days–if you can even put it together in the first place.”

Ouch.

Later in the train ride, the boy said that he was really thirsty. The dad told him that there was a drinking fountain in the front of the train. The boy said, “Really?” The dad replied in the affirmative. When the boy stood up to go look for the fountain, the dad started laughing at the boy’s expense. I guess he thought it was funny that he had tricked his thirsty son into looking for a non-existent drinking fountain on the train.

I share this story not in an effort to make this father look like an awful person or to say that he was totally unkind or horrible or whatever.

I share this story for two reasons. First, I think it illustrates the point that Anthony Robbins makes in the above-mentioned quote. I can’t judge this man because I don’t know how he sees the world. I can’t judge the reaction of this boy because I don’t understand his perception of the world. I can, however, notice how the boy reacted to the communication (both verbal and non-verbal) of his parents. After being told that he “didn’t look smart” by both of his parents, he ducked his head and didn’t say anything for a few minutes. My perception of this incident was that even though he heard the teasing tones in his parent’s voices, twice in less than a minute he was told that he didn’t look smart. That has got to sting, no matter how much sarcasm was in a parent’s voice. (What do they say about sarcasm? It’s 80% truth?)

Second, I think the experience was enlightening for me. I tend to be a teaser. I like to give people a hard time in a joking way. However, when I watched the same kind of communication from the outside, it wasn’t funny. It only seemed hurtful. I need to watch the way I communicate with other people to make sure my communication patterns are building people up, not dragging them down.

Look at the world around you. Are your communication patterns a force for building or a force for destroying (however slowly)?

“Literally” isn’t so “literal” anymore“Literally” isn’t so “literal” anymore

Posted September 17th, 2004 by Paul.
Category: Opinion, Technical Writing | 1 Comment »

This morning I was listening to the radio and I heard an advertisement for a car dealership claiming: “we are literally bursting at the seams, and need to reduce our inventory.”

I thought to myself, “Really? I’d like to see that.”

Then I thought, “Do car dealerships have seams?”

I mean, do you really want to walk into a car dealership where the side wall might burst out at any moment? Do car dealerships carry “seam-bursting” insurance?

Upon further investigation (consulting Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary and the OED), I have concluded that the meaning of “literally” has literally been adulterated!

From Merriam-Webster’s:

1 : in a literal sense or manner : ACTUALLY
2 : in effect : VIRTUALLY
usage Since some people take sense 2 to be the opposite of sense 1, it has been frequently criticized as a misuse. Instead, the use is pure hyperbole intended to gain emphasis, but it often appears in contexts where no additional emphasis is necessary.

Oh. So does that make it okay?

From the OED:

1. a. By the letters (of a name).; b. In letters or literature.
2. a. With
reference to a report, translation, etc.: In the very words, word for word.; b.
transf. With exact fidelity of representation.
3. a. In the literal sense.;
b. Used to indicate that the following word or phrase must be taken in its
literal sense. Now often improperly used to indicate that some
conventional metaphorical or
hyperbolical phrase is to be taken in the strongest admissible sense.

I guess “literally” no longer has its literary meaning of “literal.” And if you can follow that, you’re probably as upset as I am. Or you should be.

After all, I am prescriptive at heart!